Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:09 AM
It's all in my mind.
I finished "The Picture Of Dorian Gray" by Oscar Wilde last night. Pretty pleased, because a particular somebody said that she would 佩服我 if i accomplished that. This one is the unabridged version, you see.
The problematic thing was with reading it. Sure, I could understand it alright, but I did not really like the contents of what I read. Several years back, I was reading the abridged version at a bookstore and liked the book immensely. The plot attracted me, somehow. I even recommended it to the above somebody, and it surprised me that she did not enjoy it. I didn't know why- still don't. Though this time, reading the unabridged version, I began to dislike the book in several ways. The plot is still fine- it is the characters that I dislike, and alongside them, the conversations held.
I disliked Basil Hallward, the artist of the above mentioned Picture. Although he idolized the subject of his art alot, the way it was presented seemed... wrong. Basil Hallward is a man. Dorian Gray is a man. Even though it's simply because Dorian Gray inspired his works or whatsits, the way Basil Hallward expressed it upon Dorian Gray's question seemed wrong. It was okay at the start, when Sir Henry was the audience, however.
Sir Henry is another character that I resent. This time, seriously. His advice to Dorian Gray is all wrong. Without looking the part, Sir Henry is a demonic character, whom I would point to as the source of Dorian Gray's wrongdoings. Let me just quote some of Oscar Wilde's work.
Lord Henry laughed. "I don't desire to change anything in England except the weather," he answered. "I am quite content with philosophic contemplation. But, as the nineteenth century has gone bankrupt through an overexpenditure of sympathy, I would suggest that we should appeal to science to put us straight. The advantage of the emotions is that they lead us astray, and the advantage of science is that it is not emotional."
"But we have such grave responsibilities," ventured Mrs. Vandeleur, timidly.
"Terribly grave," echoed Lady Agatha.
Lord Henry looked over at Mr. Erskine. "Humanity takes itself too seriously. It is the world's original sin. If the cavemen had known how to laugh, history would have been different."
blah blah blah, blah blah, then:
He thought for a moment. "Can you remember any great error that you committed in your early days, Duchess?" he asked, looking at her across the table.
"A great many, I fear," she cried.
"Then commit them over again," he said gravely. "To get back one's youth, one has merely to repeat one's follies."
Do you see that? This is merely part of Lord Henry's absurd view on life! He puts across crazy, yet logical SOUNDING speeches about women (terribly degrading), sins (to ask Dorian Gray to commit them) amongst others! He's crazy! He even said somewhere that the greatest sin was boredom! Mad guy!
During the majority of his speech, I felt this weird sensation- as if I was resisting the contents of the speech with all my might. Perhaps this is what Dorian Gray failed in, thus failed in life. And he did not realise it til his death. Amazingly crazy. But reading about it was better than Chapter 11, however. Too long, with no conversations, thoughts, whatsoever. I skipped a page without realising it, and with no particular impact on my understanding of his work.
Here is the summary of the story, in case you would feel like reading it.
An exquisitely beautiful young man in Victorian England retains his youthful and innocent appearance over the years while his portrait reflects both his age and evil soul as he persues a life of decadence and corruption.
That marks the end of this post.
P.S. I reflected that Jane Eyre, by Charlotte Bronte is probably the base of what Stephenie Meyer wrote, in Twilight. Many ideas are reversed, or nearly the same. It is interesting that SM quoted Emily Bronte's Wuthering Heights, and not her sister's Jane Eyre, then. Jane Eyre is a great read. So is Wuthering Heights. Really worth reading. =)